Suchergebnisse

Legal documents from the United States District Court pertaining to the civil suit filed to halt the development of the Arizona Snow Bowl on the San Francisco Peaks. Appellants include Richard and Jean Wilson, the Hopi Indian Tribe, and Navajo Medicinemen's Assoication, et. al. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Legal documents from the United States District Court pertaining to the civil suit filed to halt the development of the Arizona Snow Bowl on the San Francisco Peaks. Appellants include Richard and Jean Wilson, the Hopi Indian Tribe, and Navajo Medicinemen's Assoication, et. al. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Transcript of proceedings in Case Z-79-9, the Rezoning Request from A-R to C-1 on Property located at the Northwest Corner of Highway 180 and Snowbowl Road filed by Norman Johnson. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Legal documents and transcripts related to civil suit in United States District Court pertianing to the regional forester's decision to allow development on the San Francisco Peaks. Appellants include Richard and Jean Wilson, the Hopi Indian Tribe, and Navajo Medicinemen's Assoication, et. al. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Legal documents and transcripts related to civil suit in United States District Court pertianing to the regional forester's decision to allow development on the San Francisco Peaks. Appellants include Richard and Jean Wilson, the Hopi Indian Tribe, and Navajo Medicinemen's Assoication, et. al. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Legal documents include U.S. Senate report on the Native Americans' Right to Believe and Exercise their Traditional Native Religions Free of Federal Government Interference; and Joint Resolution 102 affirming support for American Indian Religious Freedom.

Documents, letters and newspaper clippings on the expansion of the Snow Bowl. Materials from task force and meetings concerning the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, legal summaries of the Hopi v. Block and Snow Bowl litigation civil case, the listing of Senecio franciscanus as an endangered species, and how the expansion violates the Endangered Species Act. Newspaper articles reprinted with permission from the Arizona Daily Sun. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Documents, letters and newspaper clippings on the expansion of the Snow Bowl. Materials from task force and meetings concerning the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, legal summaries of the Hopi v. Block and Snow Bowl litigation civil case, the listing of Senecio franciscanus as an endangered species, and how the expansion violates the Endangered Species Act. Newspaper articles reprinted with permission from the Arizona Daily Sun. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Correspondence and documents pertain to the administrative review of the expansion of the Arizona Snow Bowl skiing facilities. Specific information concerning decisions made by the U.S. Forest Service, Endangered Species Act, and solicitation of public participation. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Correspondence and documents pertain to the administrative review of the expansion of the Arizona Snow Bowl skiing facilities. Specific information concerning decisions made by the U.S. Forest Service, Endangered Species Act, and solicitation of public participation. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Legal documents concerning the "Save the Peaks" controversy, 1972-1977, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. Includes an article from the Arizona Daily Sun, 1977. Articles reprinted with permission from the Arizona Daily Sun. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Media clippings from the Arizona Daily Sun related to the court case (Wilson v. Summit Properties Inc.). Topics reported on include: Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission, Hart Prairie, San Francisco Peaks, United States Forest Service, Friends of the Peaks, and Summit Properties Inc. Comments and feedback associated with proposed draft of planning and zoning of the Arizona Snow Bowl recreational area. Newspaper articles reprinted with permission from the Arizona Daily Sun . BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Volume one of Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission Transcript Proceedings: Public Hearing on rezoning of Hart Prairie. Topics include land use and function, construction, and development for business and recreation. Speakers discuss balance between private ownership, public domain, Native American spiritual and religious aspects, and the business community's interests. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: The Apellees'legal documents concerning the 'Save the Peaks' controversy, 1974, over the Hart Prairie development and Snow Bowl expansion by Summit Properties. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Volume two of Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission Transcript Proceedings: Public Hearing on rezoning of Hart Praire. Topics include land use and function, construction, and development for business and recreation. Speakers discuss balance between private ownership, public domain, Native American spiritual and religious aspects, and the business community's interests. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.